花椒直播

Skip to main contentSkip to main navigationSkip to footer content

Title IX

Policies and Processes

Sexual Harassment Policy

Sexual Harassment Hearing Procedures & Grievances

Contacts

Emergency: 911

Public Safety: 913-683-5201

USM Title IX Correspondent 913-758-6333

USM Campus Counseling: 913-758-6267

Many of us know about Title IX as 鈥渢he law that made school sports more equitable for girls and women.鈥 Yet, there鈥檚 also a lot more to it.

Sexual harassment, which includes acts of sexual violence such as rape, sexual battery, and sexual coercion, is a form of gender-based discrimination prohibited by Title IX. It creates a hostile environment 鈥 and has no place on the University of Saint Mary campus.

This is something USM takes very seriously as we work to keep you safe and to respond effectively and immediately when you鈥檙e in trouble.

If you or someone you know is experiencing sexual harassment/sexual violence, USM can provide support and put you in touch with resources right away.


 

I. GENERAL POLICY STATEMENT

The 花椒直播 (the 鈥淯niversity鈥), in compliance with the U.S. Department of Education鈥檚 implementing regulations for Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972 (鈥淭itle IX鈥) (see 34 C.F.R. 搂 106 et seq.), prohibits Sexual Harassment that occurs within its Education Programs or Activities.

Violations of this policy will be investigated according to the this policy and in conjunction with the Sexual Harassment Hearing Procedures and can lead to the full range of University discipline including verbal reprimand; written reprimand; mandatory training, or counseling; mandatory monitoring; partial or full probation; partial or full suspension; fines; permanent separation from the institution (that is, termination or dismissal); physical restriction from University property; cancellation of contracts; and any combination of the same.

The University will provide persons who have experienced Sexual Harassment ongoing remedies as reasonably necessary to restore or preserve access to the University鈥檚 Education Programs or Activities.

II. SCOPE

This policy applies to Sexual Harassment that occurs within the University鈥檚 Education Programs or Activities and that is committed by an administrator, faculty member, staff, student, contractor, guest, or other member of the University community.

This policy does not apply to Sexual Harassment that occurs off-campus, in a private setting, and outside the scope of the University鈥檚 Education Programs or Activities; such sexual misconduct may be prohibited by the Student Handbook if committed by a student or other University policies and standards if committed by an employee.

Consistent with the U.S. Department of Education鈥檚 implementing regulations for Title IX, this policy does not apply to Sexual Harassment that occurs outside the geographic boundaries of the United States, even if the Sexual Harassment occurs in the University鈥檚 Education Programs or Activities. Sexual Harassment that occurs outside the geographic boundaries of the United States is governed by the Student Handbook if committed by a student or other University policies and standards if committed by an employee.

Sexual Harassment can occur between members of the opposite sex and members of the same sex, and both males and females can engage in conduct that is considered Sexual Harassment.

III. DEFINITIONS

  1. 鈥淪exual Harassment鈥 is conduct on the basis of sex that constitutes Quid Pro Quo Sexual Harassment, Hostile Environment Sexual Harassment, Sexual Assault, Domestic Violence, Dating Violence, or Stalking.
  2. 鈥淨uid Pro Quo Sexual Harassment鈥 is an employee of the University conditioning the provision of an aid, benefit, or service of the University on an individual鈥檚 participation in unwelcome sexual conduct.
  3. 鈥淗ostile Environment Sexual Harassment鈥 is unwelcome conduct determined by a reasonable person to be so severe, pervasive, and objectively offensive that it effectively denies a person access to the University鈥檚 Education Programs or Activities.

    In determining whether a hostile environment exists, the University will consider the totality of circumstances, including factors such as the actual impact the conduct has had on the Complainant; the nature and severity of the conduct at issue; the frequency and duration of the conduct; the relationship between the parties (including accounting for whether one individual has power or authority over the other); the context in which the conduct occurred; and the number of persons affected. The University will evaluate the totality of circumstances from the perspective of a reasonable person in the Complainant鈥檚 position. A person鈥檚 adverse subjective reaction to conduct is not sufficient, in and of itself, to establish the existence of a hostile environment.

    芒鈧筍ome specific examples of conduct that may constitute Sexual Harassment if unwelcome include, but are not limited to:
    1. Unreasonable pressure for a dating, romantic, or intimate relationship or sexual contact
    2. Unwelcome kissing, hugging, or massaging
    3. Sexual innuendos, jokes, or humor
    4. Displaying sexual graffiti, pictures, videos, or posters
    5. Using sexually explicit profanity
    6. Asking about, or telling about, sexual fantasies, sexual preferences, or sexual activities
    7. E-mail, internet, or other electronic use that violates this policy
    8. Leering or staring at someone in a sexual way, such as staring at a person鈥檚 breasts or groin
    9. Sending sexually explicit emails, text messages, or social media posts
    10. Commenting on a person鈥檚 dress in a sexual manner
    11. Giving unwelcome personal gifts such as lingerie that suggest the desire for a romantic relationship
  4. 鈥淪exual Assault鈥 includes the sex offenses of Rape, Sodomy, Sexual Assault with an Object, Fondling, Incest, and Statutory Rape [Note: [1] The University鈥檚 definition of 鈥淪exual Assault鈥 is mandated by federal regulations implementing Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972.  Those regulations require the University to adopt a definition of 鈥淪exual Assault鈥 that incorporates various forcible and non-forcible sex crimes as defined by the FBI鈥檚 Uniform Crime Reporting System.  See 34 C.F.R. 搂 106.30(a).].
    1. 鈥淩ape鈥 is the carnal knowledge of a person, without the consent of the victim, including instances where the victim is incapable of giving consent because of his/her age or because of his/her temporary or permanent mental or physical incapacity. There is 鈥渃arnal knowledge鈥 if there is the slightest penetration of the vagina or penis by the sexual organ of the other person. Attempted Rape is included.
    2. 鈥淪odomy鈥 is oral or anal sexual intercourse with another person, without the consent of the victim, including instances where the victim is incapable of giving consent because of his/her age or because of his/her temporary or permanent mental or physical incapacity.
    3. 鈥淪exual Assault with an Object鈥 is using an object or instrument to unlawfully penetrate, however slightly, the genital or anal opening of the body of another person, without the consent of the victim, including instances where the victim is incapable of giving consent because of his/her age or because of his/her temporary or permanent mental or physical incapacity. An 鈥渙bject鈥 or 鈥渋nstrument鈥 is anything used by the offender other than the offender鈥檚 genitalia.
    4. 鈥淔ondling鈥 is the touching of the private body parts of another person for the purpose of sexual gratification, without the consent of the victim, including instances where the victim is incapable of giving consent because of his/her age or because of his/her temporary or permanent mental or physical incapacity.
    5. 鈥淚ncest鈥 is sexual intercourse between persons who are related to each other within the degrees wherein marriage is prohibited by Kansas law.
    6. 鈥淪tatutory Rape鈥 is sexual intercourse with a person who is under the statutory age of consent as defined by Kansas law.
  5. 鈥淒omestic Violence鈥 is felony or misdemeanor crimes of violence committed by a current or former spouse or intimate partner of the victim, by a person with whom the victim shares a child in common, by a person who is cohabitating with or has cohabitated with the victim as a spouse or intimate partner, by a person similarly situated to a spouse of the victim under the domestic or family violence laws of Kansas, or by any other person against an adult or youth victim who is protected from that person鈥檚 acts under the domestic or family violence laws of Kansas.
  6. 鈥淒ating Violence鈥 is violence committed by a person 鈥
    1. Who is or has been in a social relationship of a romantic or intimate nature with the victim; and
    2. Where the existence of such a relationship will be determined based on a consideration of the following factors:
      1. The length of the relationship;
      2. The type of relationship; and
      3. The frequency of interaction between the persons involved in the relationship.
  7. 鈥淪talking鈥 is engaging in a course of conduct directed at a specific person that would cause a reasonable person to:
    1. Fear for their safety or the safety of others; or
    2. Suffer substantial emotional distress.
  8. 鈥淐onsent鈥 refers to words or actions that a reasonable person in the perspective of the Respondent would understand as agreement to engage in the sexual conduct at issue. A person who is Incapacitated is not capable of giving Consent.

    Lack of consent is a critical factor in determining whether sexual violence has occurred. Consent is informed, freely given, and mutually understood. Consent requires an affirmative act or statement by each participant. Consent is not passive.
    1. If coercion, intimidation, threats, and/or physical force are used, there is no consent.
    2. If a person is mentally or physically incapacitated or impaired by alcohol or drugs such that the person cannot understand the fact, nature, or extent of the sexual situation, there is no consent.
    3. If a person is asleep or unconscious, there is no consent.
    4. Consent to one form of sexual activity does not imply consent to other forms of sexual activity.
    5. Consent can be withdrawn. A person who initially consents to sexual activity is deemed not to have consented to any sexual activity that occurs after he or she withdraws consent.
  9. 鈥淚ncapacitated鈥 refers to the state where a person does not appreciate the nature or fact of sexual activity due to the effect of drugs or alcohol consumption, medical condition or disability, or due to a state of unconsciousness or sleep.

    Incapacitation is a state where an individual cannot make an informed and rational decision to consent to engage in sexual contact because the individual lacks conscious knowledge of the nature of the act (e.g., to understand the 鈥渨ho, what, where, when, why or how鈥 of the sexual interaction) and/or is physically or mentally helpless. An individual is also considered incapacitated, and therefore unable to give consent, when asleep, unconscious, or otherwise unaware that sexual contact is occurring.

    Incapacitation can only be found when the Respondent knew or should have known that the Complainant was incapacitated when viewed from the position of a sober, reasonable person. One鈥檚 own intoxication is not an excuse for failure to recognize another person鈥檚 incapacitation. Incapacitation may result from the use of alcohol and/or other drugs; however, consumption of alcohol of other drugs, inebriation, or intoxication alone are insufficient to establish incapacitation. Incapacitation is beyond mere drunkenness or intoxication. The impact of alcohol or drugs varies from person to person, and evaluating incapacitation requires an assessment of how consumption of alcohol and/or drugs impacts an individual鈥檚:
    1. Decision-making ability
    2. Awareness of consequences
    3. Ability to make informed judgments
    4. Capacity to appreciate the nature of circumstances of the act.

      No single factor is determinative of incapacitation. Some common signs that someone may be incapacitated include slurred speech, confusion, shaky balance, stumbling or falling down, vomiting, and unconsciousness.
  10. 鈥淩etaliation鈥 is intimidation, threats, coercion, or discrimination against any individual for the purpose of interfering with any right or privilege secured by Title IX and its implementing regulations or because an individual has made a report or complaint, testified, assisted, or participated or refused to participate in any manner in an investigation, proceeding, or hearing under this policy.
  11. 鈥淐omplainant鈥 means an individual who is alleged to be the victim of conduct that could constitute Sexual Harassment.
  12. 鈥淩espondent鈥 means an individual who has been reported to be the perpetrator of conduct that could constitute Sexual Harassment.
  13. 鈥淔ormal Complaint鈥 means a document filed by a Complainant or signed by the Title IX Correspondent alleging Sexual Harassment against a Respondent and requesting that the University investigate the allegation of Sexual Harassment in accordance with this policy. At the time of filing a Formal Complaint, a Complainant must be participating in or attempting to participate in the University鈥檚 Education Programs or Activities. A 鈥渄ocument filed by a Complainant鈥 means a document or electronic submission (such as an email) that contains the Complainant鈥檚 physical or electronic signature or otherwise indicates that the Complainant is the person filing the Complaint.
  14. 鈥淪upportive Measures鈥 are non-disciplinary, non-punitive individualized services offered, as appropriate, and reasonably available, and without fee or charge, that are designed to restore or preserve equal access to the University鈥檚 Education Programs or Activities without unreasonably burdening another party, including measures designed to protect the safety of all parties implicated by a report or the University鈥檚 education environment, or to deter Sexual Harassment. Supportive measures may include: counseling, extensions of academic or other deadlines, course-related adjustments, modifications to work or class schedules, campus escort services, changes in work or housing locations, leaves of absence, increased security and monitoring of certain areas of campus, and other similar measures. Supportive Measures may also include mutual restrictions on contact between the parties implicated by a report.
  15. 鈥淓ducation Programs or Activities鈥 refers to all the operations of the University, including, but not limited to, in-person and online educational instruction, employment, research activities, extracurricular activities, athletics, residence life, dining services, performances, and community engagement and outreach programs. The term applies to all activity that occurs on campus or on other property owned or occupied by the University. It also includes off-campus locations, events, or circumstances over which the University exercises substantial control over the Respondent and the context in which the Sexual Harassment occurs.

IV. REPORTING SEXUAL HARASSMENT

Any person may report Sexual Harassment to the Title IX Correspondent. Reports may be made in person, by regular mail, telephone, electronic mail, or by any other means that results in the Title IX Correspondent receiving the person鈥檚 verbal or written report. In-person reports must be made during normal business hours, but reports can be made by regular mail, telephone, or electronic mail at any time, including outside normal business hours.

The contact information for the Title IX Correspondent is:

913-758-6333
TitleIX@stmary.edu
4100 South 4th Street
Leavenworth, KS 66048

Reports may be filed electronically, through Maxient Conduct Manager.鈩 Students, as well as employees, may alert the University through this system. Students may file these reports anonymously. Employees may not file reports anonymously. To file a report about an incident go to the 花椒直播 main web page (www.stmary.edu) and scroll to the bottom and choose Title IX or 鈥淩eport a Concern鈥 from any quick link section or visit /reporting. You may also access the 鈥淩eport a Concern鈥 link rom the Campus Safety and Security web page which is available to the public /campus-security.

In addition to reporting to the Title IX Correspondent, any person may report Sexual Harassment to any University employee who must promptly forward such report of Sexual Harassment to the Title IX Correspondent. University students who are not employees are encouraged, but are not required to, forward reports of Sexual Harassment to the Title IX Correspondent.

A person may also file a complaint with the United States Department of Education鈥檚 Office for Civil Rights regarding an alleged violation of Title IX by visiting  or by calling 1-800-421-3481. The local office is at 8930 Ward Parkway, Ste. 2037, Kansas City, MO 64114-3302. Contact information for the local office is as follows: Phone: (916) 268-0550; Fax: (816) 823-1404; Email: OCR.KansasCity@ed.gov.

V. SPECIAL GUIDANCE FOR INDIVIDUALS REPORTING SEXUAL ASSAULT, DOMESTIC VIOLENCE, DATING VIOLENCE, OR STALKING

If you believe you are the victim of Sexual Assault, Domestic Violence, or Dating Violence, get to safety and do everything possible to preserve evidence by making certain that the crime scene is not disturbed. Preservation of evidence may be necessary for proof of the crime or in obtaining a protection order. For those who believe that they are victims of Sexual Assault, Domestic Violence, or Dating Violence, the University recommends the following:

  • Get to a safe place as soon as possible.
  • Try to preserve all physical evidence of the crime鈥攁void bathing, using the toilet, rinsing one鈥檚 mouth or changing clothes. If it is necessary, put all clothing that was worn at the time of the incident in a paper bag, not a plastic one.
  • Do not launder or discard bedding or otherwise clean the area where the assault occurred- preserve for law enforcement
  • Preserve all forms of electronic communication that occurred before, during, or after the assault
  • Contact law enforcement by calling 911.
  • Get medical attention - all medical injuries are not immediately apparent. This will also help collect evidence that may be needed in case the individual decides to press charges. Local hospitals have evidence collection kits necessary for criminal prosecution should the victim wish to pursue charges. Take a full change of clothing, including shoes, for use after a medical examination.
  • Contact a trusted person, such as a friend or family member for support.
  • Talk with a professional licensed counselor or health care provider who can help explain options, give information, and provide emotional support.
  • Make a report to the Title IX Correspondent.
  • Explore this policy and avenues for resolution.

It is also important to take steps to preserve evidence in cases of Stalking, to the extent such evidence exists. Such evidence is more likely to be in the form of letters, emails, text messages, electronic images, etc. rather than evidence of physical contact and violence. This type of non-physical evidence will also be useful in all types of Sexual Harassment investigations.

Once a report of Sexual Assault, Domestic Violence, Dating Violence, or Stalking is made, the victim has several options such as, but not limited to:

  • obtaining Supportive Measures
  • contacting parents or a relative
  • seeking legal advice
  • seeking personal counseling (always recommended)
  • pursuing legal action against the perpetrator
  • filing a Formal Complaint
  • requesting that no further action be taken

The University鈥檚 Public Safety & Security can assist individuals in obtaining an order of protection.

VI. PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT

After receiving a report under 鈥淩eporting Sexual Harassment,鈥 the Title IX Correspondent will conduct a preliminary assessment to determine:

  • Whether the conduct, as reported, falls or could fall within the scope of this policy (see 鈥淪cope鈥); and
  • Whether the conduct, as reported, constitutes or could constitute Sexual Harassment.

If the Title IX Correspondent determines that the conduct reported could not fall within the scope of the policy, and/or could not constitute Sexual Harassment, even if investigated, the Title Correspondent will close the matter and may notify the reporting party if doing so is consistent with the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (鈥淔ERPA鈥). The Title IX Correspondent may refer the report to other University offices, as appropriate.

If the Title IX Correspondent determines that the conduct reported could fall within the scope of the policy, and/or could constitute Sexual Harassment, if investigated, the Title IX Correspondent will proceed to contact the Complainant (see 鈥淐ontacting the Complainant鈥) As part of the preliminary assessment, the Title IX Correspondent may take investigative steps to determine the identity of the Complainant, if it is not apparent from the report.

VII. CONTACTING THE COMPLAINANT

If a report is not closed as a result of the preliminary assessment and the Complainant鈥檚 identity is known, the Title IX Correspondent will promptly contact the Complainant to discuss the availability of Supportive Measures; to discuss and consider the Complainant鈥檚 wishes with respect to Supportive Measures; to inform the Complainant about the availability of Supportive Measures with or without filing a Formal Complaint; and to explain the process for filing and pursuing a Formal Complaint. The Complainant will also be provided options for filing complaints with the local police and information about resources that are available on campus and in the community.

VIII. SUPPORTIVE MEASURES

If a report is not closed as a result of the preliminary assessment, the University will offer and make available Supportive Measures to the Complainant regardless of whether the Complainant elects to file a Formal Complaint.

Contemporaneously with the Respondent being notified of a Formal Complaint, the Title IX Correspondent will notify the Respondent of the availability of Supportive Measures for the Respondent, and the University will offer and make available Supportive Measures to the Respondent in the same manner in which it offers and makes them available to the Complainant. The University will also offer and make available Supportive Measures to the Respondent prior to the Respondent being notified of a Formal Complaint, if the Respondent requests such measures.

The University will maintain the confidentiality of Supportive Measures provided to either a Complainant or Respondent, to the extent that maintaining such confidentiality does not impair the University鈥檚 ability to provide the Supportive Measures in question.

IX. INTERIM REMOVAL

At any time after receiving a report of Sexual Harassment, the Title IX Correspondent may remove a student Respondent from one or more of the University鈥檚 Education Programs or Activities on a temporary basis if an individualized safety and risk analysis determines that an immediate threat to the physical health or safety of any student or other individual arising from the allegations of Sexual Harassment justifies removal. In the event the Title IX Correspondent imposes an interim removal, the Title IX Correspondent must offer to meet with the Respondent within twenty-four hours and provide the Respondent an opportunity to challenge the interim removal.

In the case of a Respondent who is a non-student employee (administrator, faculty, or staff), and in its discretion, the University may place the Respondent on administrative leave at any time after receiving a report of Sexual Harassment, including during the pendency of the investigation and adjudication process.

For all other Respondents, including independent contractors and guests, the University retains broad discretion to prohibit such persons from entering onto its campus and other properties at any time, and for any reason, whether after receiving a report of Sexual Harassment or otherwise.

X. FORMAL COMPLAINT

A Complainant may file a Formal Complaint with the Title IX Correspondent requesting that the University investigate and adjudicate a report of Sexual Harassment in accordance with the provisions 鈥淚nvestigation鈥 and 鈥淎djudication.鈥 Provided, however, that at the time the Complainant submits a Formal Complaint, the Complainant must be participating in, or attempting to participate in, one or more of the University鈥檚 Education Programs or Activities.

A Complainant may file a Formal Complaint with the Title IX Correspondent in person, by regular mail, or by email using the contact information specified in 鈥淩eporting Sexual Harassment.鈥 No person may submit a Formal Complaint on the Complainant鈥檚 behalf.

In any case, including a case where a Complainant elects not to file a Formal Complaint, the Title IX Correspondent may file a Formal Complaint on behalf of the University if doing so is not clearly unreasonable.

If the Complainant or the Title IX Correspondent files a Formal Complaint, then the University will commence an investigation as specified in 鈥淩eporting Sexual Harassment鈥 and proceed to adjudicate the matter as specified in 鈥淎djudication,鈥 below. In all cases where a Formal Complaint is filed, the Complainant will be treated as a party, irrespective of the party鈥檚 level of participation.

In a case where the Title IX Correspondent files a Formal Complaint, the Title IX Correspondent will not act as a Complainant or otherwise as a party for purposes of the investigation and adjudication processes.

XI. CONSOLIDATION OF FORMAL COMPLAINTS

The University may consolidate Formal Complaints as to allegations of Sexual Harassment against more than one Respondent, or by more than one Complainant against one or more Respondents, or by one party against the other party, where the allegations of Sexual Harassment arise out of the same facts or circumstances. Where the investigation and adjudication process involve more than one Complainant or more than one Respondent, references in this policy to the singular 鈥減arty,鈥 鈥淐omplainant,鈥 or 鈥淩espondent鈥 include the plural, as applicable. A Formal Complaint of Retaliation may be consolidated with a Formal Complaint of Sexual Harassment.

XII. DISMISSAL PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF INVESTIGATION

In a case where the Complainant files a Formal Complaint, the Title IX Correspondent will evaluate the Formal Complaint and must dismiss it if the Title IX Correspondent determines:

  • The conduct alleged in the Formal Complaint would not constitute Sexual Harassment, even if proved; or
  • The conduct alleged in the Formal Complaint falls outside the scope of the policy specified in 鈥淪cope鈥 (that is, because the alleged conduct did not occur in the University鈥檚 Education Programs or Activities and/or the alleged conduct occurred outside the geographic boundaries of the United States).

In the event the Title IX Correspondent determines the Formal Complaint should be dismissed pursuant to this Section, the Title IX Correspondent will provide written notice of dismissal to the parties and advise them of their right to appeal as specified in 鈥淎ppeal.鈥 The dismissal is a final determination unless modified or overturned on appeal. The Title IX Correspondent may refer the subject matter of the Formal Complaint to other University offices, as appropriate.

XIII. NOTICE OF FORMAL COMPLAINT

Within five (5) days of the Title IX Correspondent receiving a Formal Complaint, the Title IX Correspondent will transmit a written notice to the Complainant and Respondent that includes:

  • A physical copy of this policy or a hyperlink to this policy;
  • Sufficient details known at the time so that the parties may prepare for an initial interview with the investigator, to include the identities of the parties involved in the incident (if known), the conduct allegedly constituting Sexual Harassment, and the date and location of the alleged incident (if known);
  • A statement that the Respondent is presumed not responsible for the alleged Sexual Harassment and that a determination of responsibility will not be made until the conclusion of the adjudication and any appeal;
  • Notifying the Complainant and Respondent of their right to be accompanied by an advisor of their choice, as specified in 鈥淎dvisor of Choice.鈥
  • Notifying the Complainant and Respondent of their right to inspect and review evidence as specified in 鈥淎ccess to Evidence.鈥
  • Notifying the Complainant and Respondent of the University鈥檚 prohibitions on retaliation and false statements specified in Sections 鈥淏ad Faith Complaints and False Information鈥 and 鈥淩etaliation.鈥
  • Information about resources that are available on campus and in the community.

Should the University elect, at any point, to investigate allegations that are materially beyond the scope of the initial written notice, the University will provide a supplemental written notice describing the additional allegations to be investigated.

XIV. INVESTIGATION

A. Commencement and Timing

After the written notice of Formal Complaint is transmitted to the parties, an investigator selected by the Title IX Correspondent will undertake an investigation to gather evidence relevant to the alleged misconduct, including inculpatory and exculpatory evidence. The burden of gathering evidence sufficient to reach a determination in the adjudication lies with the University and not with the parties. The investigation will culminate in a written investigation report, specified in 鈥淚nvestigation Report,鈥 that will be submitted to the adjudicator during the selected adjudication process. Although the length of each investigation may vary depending on the totality of the circumstances, the University strives to complete each investigation within thirty (30) to forty-five (45) days of the transmittal of the written notice of Formal Complaint.

B. Equal Opportunity

During the investigation, the investigator will provide an equal opportunity for the parties to be interviewed, to present witnesses (including fact and expert witnesses), and to present other inculpatory and exculpatory evidence. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the investigator retains discretion to limit the number of witness interviews the investigator conducts if the investigator finds that testimony would be unreasonably cumulative, if the witnesses are offered solely as character references and do not have information relevant to the allegations at issue, or if the witnesses are offered to render testimony that is categorically inadmissible, such as testimony concerning sexual history of the Complainant, as specified in 鈥淪exual History.鈥 The investigator will not restrict the ability of the parties to gather and present relevant evidence on their own.

The investigation is a party鈥檚 opportunity to present testimonial and other evidence that the party believes is relevant to resolution of the allegations in the Formal Complaint. A party that is aware of and has a reasonable opportunity to present particular evidence and/or identify particular witnesses during the investigation, and elects not to, will be prohibited from introducing any such evidence during the adjudication absent a showing of mistake, inadvertence, surprise, or excusable neglect.

C. Documentation of Investigation

The investigator will take reasonable steps to ensure the investigation is documented. Interviews of the parties and witnesses may be documented by the investigator鈥檚 notes, audio recorded, video recorded, or transcribed. The particular method utilized to record the interviews of parties and witnesses will be determined by the investigator in the investigator鈥檚 sole discretion, although whatever method is chosen shall be used consistently throughout a particular investigation.

D. Access to the Evidence

At the conclusion of the evidence-gathering phase of the investigation, but prior to the completion of the investigation report, the Investigating Officer will transmit to each party and their advisor, in either electronic or hard copy form, all evidence obtained as part of the investigation that is directly related to the allegations raised in the Formal Complaint, including evidence the University may choose not to rely on at any hearing and inculpatory or exculpatory evidence whether obtained from a party or some other source. Thereafter, the parties will have ten (10) days in which to submit to the investigator a written response, which the investigator will consider prior to completing the investigation report.

The parties and their advisors are permitted to review the evidence solely for the purposes of this grievance process and may not duplicate or disseminate the evidence to the public.

E. Investigation Report

After the period for the parties to provide any written response as specified 鈥淎ccess to Evidence鈥 has expired, the investigator will complete a written investigation report that fairly summarizes the various steps taken during the investigation, summarizes the relevant evidence collected, lists material facts on which the parties agree, and lists material facts on which the parties do not agree. When the investigation report is complete, the investigator will transmit a copy to the Title IX Correspondent. The investigator will also transmit the investigation report to each party and their advisor, in either electronic or hard copy form.

XV. ADJUDICATION PROCESS SELECTION

After the investigator has sent the investigation report to the parties, the Title IX Correspondent will transmit to each party a notice advising the party of the two different adjudication processes specified in 鈥淎djudication.鈥 The notice will explain that the hearing process specified in 鈥淗earing Process鈥 is the default process for adjudicating all Formal Complaints and will be utilized unless both parties voluntarily consent to administrative adjudication as specified in 鈥淎dministrative Adjudication (Optional)鈥 as a form of informal resolution. The notice will be accompanied by a written consent to administrative adjudication and will advise each party that, if both parties execute the written consent to administrative adjudication, then the administrative adjudication process will be used in in lieu of the hearing process. Parties are urged to carefully review this policy (including the entirety of 鈥淎djudication鈥), consult with their advisor, and consult with other persons as they deem appropriate (including an attorney) prior to consenting to administrative adjudication.

Each party will have three (3) days from transmittal of the notice specified in this Section to return the signed written consent form to the Title IX Correspondent. If either party does not timely return the signed written consent, that party will be deemed not to have consented to administrative adjudication and the Formal Complaint will be adjudicated pursuant to the hearing process.

XVI. ADJUDICATION

A. Hearing Process

The default process for adjudicating Formal Complaints is the hearing process specified in this Section (鈥淗earing Process鈥). The hearing process will be used to adjudicate all Formal Complaints unless both parties timely consent to administrative adjudication as specified in 鈥淎djudication Process Selection.鈥

1. Hearing Officer

After selection of the hearing process as the form of administrative adjudication, the Title IX Correspondent will promptly appoint a hearing officer who will oversee the hearing process and render a determination of responsibility for the allegations in the Formal Complaint, at the conclusion of the hearing process. The Title IX Correspondent will see that the hearing officer is provided a copy of the investigation report and a copy of all evidence transmitted to the parties by the investigator as specified in 鈥淎ccess to Evidence.鈥

2. Hearing Notice and Response to the Investigation Report

After the hearing officer is appointed by the Title IX Correspondent, the hearing officer will promptly transmit written notice to the parties notifying the parties of the hearing officer鈥檚 appointment; setting a deadline for the parties to submit any written response to the investigation report; setting a date for the pre-hearing conference; setting a date and time for the hearing; and providing a copy of the University鈥檚 Hearing Procedures. Neither the pre-hearing conference, nor the hearing itself, may be held any earlier than ten (10) days from the date of transmittal of the written notice specified in this Section.

A party鈥檚 written response to the investigation report must include:

  • To the extent the party disagrees with the investigation report, any argument or commentary regarding such disagreement;
  • Any argument that evidence should be categorically excluded from consideration at the hearing based on privilege, relevance, the prohibition on the use of sexual history specified in 鈥淪exual History,鈥 or for any other reason;
  • A list of any witnesses that the party contends should be requested to attend the hearing pursuant to an attendance notice issued by the hearing officer;
  • A list of any witnesses that the party intends to bring to the hearing without an attendance notice issued by the hearing officer;
  • Any objection that the party has to the University鈥檚 Hearing Procedures;
  • Any request that the parties be separated physically during the pre-hearing conference and/or hearing;
  • Any other accommodations that the party seeks with respect to the pre-hearing conference and/or hearing;
  • The name and contact information of the advisor who will accompany the party at the pre-hearing conference and hearing;
  • If the party does not have an advisor who will accompany the party at the hearing, a request that the University provide an advisor for purposes of conducting questioning as specified in 鈥淗earing.鈥

A party鈥檚 written response to the investigation report may also include:

  • Argument regarding whether any of the allegations in the Formal Complaint are supported by a preponderance of the evidence; and
  • Argument regarding whether any of the allegations in the Formal Complaint constitute Sexual Harassment.
3. Pre-Hearing Conference

Prior to the hearing, the hearing officer will conduct a pre-hearing conference with the parties and their advisors. The pre-hearing conference will be conducted live, with simultaneous and contemporaneous participation by the parties and their advisors. By default, the pre-hearing conference will be conducted with the hearing officer, the parties, the advisors, and other necessary University personnel together in the same physical location. However, upon request of either party, the parties will be separated into different rooms with technology enabling the parties to participate simultaneously and contemporaneously by video and audio.

In the hearing officer鈥檚 discretion, the pre-hearing conference may be conducted virtually, by use of video and audio technology, where all participants participate simultaneously and contemporaneously by use of such technology.

During the pre-hearing conference, the hearing officer will discuss the hearing procedures with the parties; address matters raised in the parties鈥 written responses to the investigation report, as the hearing officer deems appropriate; discuss whether any stipulations may be made to expedite the hearing; discuss the witnesses the parties have requested be served with notices of attendance and/or witnesses the parties plan to bring to the hearing without a notice of attendance; and resolve any other matters that the hearing officer determines, in the hearing officer鈥檚 discretion, should be resolved before the hearing.

4. Issuance of Notices of Attendance

After the pre-hearing conference, the hearing officer will transmit notices of attendance to any University employee (including administrator, faculty, or staff) or student whose attendance is requested at the hearing as a witness. The notice will advise the subject of the specified date and time of the hearing and advise the subject to contact the hearing officer immediately if there is a material and unavoidable conflict.

The subject of an attendance notice should notify any manager, faculty member, coach, or other supervisor, as necessary, if attendance at the hearing will conflict with job duties, classes, or other obligations. All such managers, faculty members, coaches, and other supervisors are required to excuse the subject of the obligation, or provide some other accommodation, so that the subject may attend the hearing as specified in the notice.

The University will not issue a notice of attendance to any witness who is not an employee or a student.

5. Hearing

After the pre-hearing conference, the hearing officer will convene and conduct a hearing pursuant to the University鈥檚 Hearing Procedures. The hearing will be audio recorded. The audio recording will be made available to the parties for inspection and review on reasonable notice, including for use in preparing any subsequent appeal.

The hearing will be conducted live, with simultaneous and contemporaneous participation by the parties and their advisors. By default, the hearing will be conducted with the hearing officer, the parties, the advisors, witnesses, and other necessary University personnel together in the same physical location. However, upon request of either party, the parties will be separated into different rooms with technology enabling the parties to participate simultaneously and contemporaneously by video and audio.

In the hearing officer鈥檚 discretion, the hearing may be conducted virtually, by use of video and audio technology, where all participants participate simultaneously and contemporaneously by use of such technology.

While the Hearing Procedures and rulings from the hearing officer will govern the particulars of the hearing, each hearing will include, at a minimum:

  • Opportunity for each party to address the hearing officer directly and to respond to questions posed by the hearing officer;
  • Opportunity for each party鈥檚 advisor to ask directly, orally, and in real time, relevant questions, and follow up questions, of the other party and any witnesses, including questions that support or challenge credibility;
  • Opportunity for each party to raise contemporaneous objections to testimonial or non-testimonial evidence and to have such objections ruled on by the hearing officer and a reason for the ruling provided;
  • Opportunity for each party to submit evidence that the party did not present during the investigation due to mistake, inadvertence, surprise, or excusable neglect;
  • Opportunity for each party to make a brief closing argument.

Except as otherwise permitted by the hearing officer, the hearing will be closed to all persons except the parties, their advisors, the investigator, the hearing officer, the Title IX Correspondent, and other necessary University personnel. With the exception of the investigator and the parties, witnesses will be sequestered until such time as their testimony is complete.

During the hearing, the parties and their advisors will have access to the investigation report and evidence that was transmitted to them pursuant to 鈥淎ccess to Evidence.鈥

While a party has the right to attend and participate in the hearing with an advisor, a party and/or advisor who materially and repeatedly violates the rules of the hearing in such a way as to be materially disruptive, may be barred from further participation and/or have their participation limited, as the case may be, in the discretion of the hearing officer.

Subject to the minimum requirements specified in this Section (鈥淗earing鈥), the hearing officer will have sole discretion to determine the manner and particulars of any given hearing, including with respect to the length of the hearing, the order of the hearing, and questions of admissibility. The hearing officer will independently and contemporaneously screen questions for relevance in addition to resolving any contemporaneous objections raised by the parties and will explain the rational for any evidentiary rulings.

The hearing is not a formal judicial proceeding and strict rules of evidence do not apply. The hearing officer will have discretion to modify the Hearing Procedures, when good cause exists to do so, and provided the minimal requirements specified in this Section (鈥淗earing鈥) are met.

6. Subjection to Questioning

In the event that any party or witness refuses to attend the hearing, or attends but refuses to submit to questioning by the parties鈥 advisors, the statements of that party or witness, as the case may be, whether given during the investigation or during the hearing, will not be considered by the hearing officer in reaching a determination of responsibility.

Notwithstanding the foregoing, the hearing officer may consider the testimony of any party or witness, whether given during the investigation or during the hearing, if the parties jointly stipulate that the testimony may be considered or in the case where neither party requested attendance of the witness at the hearing.

In applying this Section (鈥淪ubjection to Questioning鈥), the hearing officer will not draw an inference about the determination regarding responsibility based solely on a party or a witness鈥檚 absence from the live hearing and/or refusal to submit to questioning by the parties鈥 advisors.

7. Deliberation and Determination

After the hearing is complete, the hearing officer will objectively evaluate all relevant evidence collected during the investigation, including both inculpatory and exculpatory evidence, together with testimony and non-testimony evidence received at the hearing, and ensure that any credibility determinations made are not based on a person鈥檚 status as a Complainant, Respondent, or witness. The hearing officer will take care to exclude from consideration any evidence that was ruled inadmissible at the pre-hearing conference, during the hearing, or by operation of 鈥淪ubjection to Questioning.鈥 The hearing officer will resolve disputed facts using a preponderance of the evidence (that is, 鈥渕ore likely than not鈥) standard and reach a determination regarding whether the facts that are supported by a preponderance of the evidence constitute one or more violations of the policy as alleged in the Formal Complaint.

8. Discipline and Remedies

In the event the hearing officer determines that the Respondent is responsible for violating this policy, the hearing officer will, prior to issuing a written decision, consult with an appropriate University official with disciplinary authority over the Respondent and such official will determine any discipline to be imposed. The hearing officer will also, prior to issuing a written decision, consult with the Title IX Correspondent who will determine whether and to what extent ongoing support measures or other remedies will be provided to the Complainant.

9. Written Decision

After reaching a determination and consulting with the appropriate University official and Title IX Correspondent as required by 鈥淒iscipline and Remedies,鈥 the hearing officer will prepare a written decision that will include:

  • Identification of the allegations potentially constituting Sexual Harassment made in the Formal Complaint;
  • A description of the procedural steps taken by the University upon receipt of the Formal Complaint, through issuance of the written decision, including notification to the parties, interviews with the parties and witnesses, site visits, methods used to gather non-testimonial evidence, and the date, location, and people who were present at or presented testimony at the hearing.
  • Articulate findings of fact, made under a preponderance of the evidence standard, that support the determination;
  • A statement of, and rationale for, each allegation that constitutes a separate potential incident of Sexual Harassment, including a determination regarding responsibility for each separate potential incident;
  • The discipline determined by the appropriate University official as referenced in 鈥淒iscipline and Remedies鈥;
  • Whether the Complainant will receive any ongoing support measures or other remedies as determined by the Title IX Correspondent; and
  • A description of the University鈥檚 process and grounds for appeal, as specified in 鈥淎ppeal.鈥

The hearing officer鈥檚 written determination will be transmitted to the parties. Transmittal of the written determination to the parties concludes the hearing process, subject to any right of appeal as specified in 鈥淎ppeal.鈥

Although the length of each adjudication by hearing will vary depending on the totality of the circumstances, the University strives to issue the hearing officer鈥檚 written determination within fourteen (14) days of the conclusion of the hearing.

B. Administrative Adjudication (Optional)

In lieu of the hearing process, the parties may consent to have a Formal Complaint resolved by administrative adjudication as a form of informal resolution. Administrative adjudication is voluntary and must be consented to in writing by both parties and approved by the Title IX Correspondent as specified in 鈥滱djudication Process Selection.鈥 At any time prior to the issuance of the administrative officer鈥檚 determination, a party has the right to withdraw from administrative adjudication and request a live hearing as specified in 鈥滺earing Process.鈥

If administrative adjudication is selected, the Title IX Correspondent will appoint an administrative officer. The Title IX Correspondent will see that the administrative adjudicator is provided a copy of the investigation report and a copy of all the evidence transmitted to the parties by the investigator as specified in 鈥淎ccess to Evidence.鈥

The administrative officer will promptly send written notice to the parties notifying the parties of the administrative officer鈥檚 appointment; setting a deadline for the parties to submit any written response to the investigation report; and setting a date and time for each party to meet with the administrative officer separately. The administrative officer鈥檚 meetings with the parties will not be held any earlier than ten (10) days from the date of transmittal of the written notice specified in this paragraph.

A party鈥檚 written response to the investigation report must include:

  • To the extent the party disagrees with the investigation report, any argument or commentary regarding such disagreement;
  • Any argument that a particular piece or class of evidence should be categorically excluded from consideration at the hearing based on privilege, relevancy, the prohibition on the use of sexual history specified in 鈥淪exual History,鈥 or for any other reason;
  • Argument regarding whether any of the allegations in the Formal Complaint are supported by a preponderance of the evidence;
  • Argument regarding whether any of the allegations in the Formal Complaint constitute Sexual Harassment.

After reviewing the parties鈥 written responses, the administrative officer will meet separately with each party to provide the party with an opportunity make any oral argument or commentary the party wishes to make and for the administrative officer to ask questions concerning the party鈥檚 written response, the investigative report, and/or the evidence collected during the investigation.

After meeting with each party, the administrative officer will objectively evaluate all relevant evidence, including both inculpatory and exculpatory evidence and ensure that any credibility determinations made are not based on a person鈥檚 status as a Complainant, Respondent, or witness. The administrative officer will take care to exclude from consideration any evidence that the administrative officer determines should be ruled inadmissible based on the objections and arguments raised by the parties in their respective written responses to the investigation report. The administrative officer will resolve disputed facts using a preponderance of the evidence (that is, 鈥渕ore likely than not鈥) standard and reach a determination regarding whether the facts that are supported by a preponderance of the evidence constitute one or more violations of the policy as alleged in the Formal Complaint.

Thereafter, the administrative officer will consult with any University official and the Title IX Correspondent, in the manner specified in 鈥淒eliberation and Determination鈥 and will prepare and transmit a written decision in the manner as specified in 鈥淲ritten Decision鈥 which shall serve as a resolution for purposes of informal resolution.

Transmittal of the administrative officer鈥檚 written determination concludes the administrative adjudication, subject to any right of appeal as specified in 鈥淎ppeal.鈥

Although the length of each administrative adjudication will vary depending on the totality of the circumstances, the University strives to issue the administrative officer鈥檚 written determination within twenty-one (21) days of the transmittal of the initiating written notice specified in this Section (鈥淎dministrative Adjudication鈥).

Other language in this Section (鈥淎dministrative Adjudication鈥) notwithstanding, informal resolution will not be permitted if the Respondent is a non-student employee accused of committing Sexual Harassment against a student

XVII. DISMISSAL DURING INVESTIGATION OR ADJUDICATION

The University shall dismiss a Formal Complaint at any point during the investigation or adjudication process if the Title IX Correspondent determines that one or more of the following is true:

  • The conduct alleged in the Formal Complaint would not constitute Sexual Harassment, even if proved; or
  • The conduct alleged in the Formal Complaint falls outside the scope of the policy specified in 鈥漇cope鈥 (that is, because the alleged conduct did not occur in the University鈥檚 Education Programs or Activities and/or the alleged conduct occurred outside the geographic boundaries of the United States).

The University may dismiss a Formal Complaint at any point during the investigation or adjudication process if the Title IX Correspondent determines that any one or more of the following is true:

  • The Complainant provides the Title IX Correspondent written notice that the Complainant wishes to withdraw the Formal Complaint or any discrete allegations therein (in which case those discrete allegations may be dismissed); 
  • The Respondent is no longer enrolled or employed by the University, as the case may be; or
  • Specific circumstances prevent the University from gathering evidence sufficient to reach a determination as to the Formal Complaint, or any discrete allegations therein (in which case those discrete allegations may be dismissed).

In the event the Title IX Correspondent dismisses a Formal Complaint pursuant to this Section, the Title IX Correspondent will provide written notice of dismissal to the parties and advise them of their right to appeal as specified in 鈥滱ppeal.鈥 The Title IX Correspondent may refer the subject matter of the Formal Complaint to other University offices, as appropriate. The dismissal is a final determination unless modified or overturned on appeal.

XVIII. APPEAL

Either party may appeal the determination of an adjudication, or a dismissal of a Formal Complaint, on one or more of the following grounds:

  • A procedural irregularity affected the outcome;
  • There is new evidence that was not reasonably available at the time the determination or dismissal was made, that could have affected the outcome;
  • The Title IX Correspondent, investigator, hearing officer, or administrative officer, as the case may be, had a conflict of interest or bias for or against complainants or respondents generally, or against the individual Complainant or Respondent, that affected the outcome.

No other grounds for appeal are permitted.

A party must file an appeal within seven (7) days of the date they receive notice of dismissal or determination appealed from or, if the other party appeals, within three (3) days of the other party appealing, whichever is later. The appeal must be submitted in writing to the appeal officer. The appeal must specifically identify the determination and/or dismissal appealed from, articulate which one or more of the three grounds for appeal are being asserted, explain in detail why the appealing party believes the appeal should be granted, and articulate what specific relief the appealing party seeks.

Promptly upon receipt of an appeal, the appeal officer will conduct an initial evaluation to confirm that the appeal is timely filed and that it invokes at least one of the permitted grounds for appeal. If the appeal officer determines that the appeal is not timely, or that it fails to invoke a permitted ground for appeal, the appeal officer will dismiss the appeal and provide written notice of the same to the parties.

If the appeal officer confirms that the appeal is timely and invokes at least one permitted ground for appeal, the appeal officer will provide written notice to the other party that an appeal has been filed and that the other party may submit a written opposition to the appeal within seven (7) days. The appeal officer shall also promptly obtain from the Title IX Correspondent any records from the investigation and adjudication necessary to resolve the grounds raised in the appeal.

Upon receipt of any opposition, or after the time period for submission of an opposition has passed without one being filed, the appeal officer will promptly decide the appeal and transmit a written decision to the parties that explains the outcome of the appeal and the rationale.

The determination of a Formal Complaint, including any discipline, becomes final when the time for appeal has passed with no party filing an appeal or, if any appeal is filed, at the point when the appeal officer has resolved all appeals, either by dismissal or by transmittal of a written decision.

No further review beyond the appeal is permitted.

Although the length of each appeal will vary depending on the totality of the circumstances, the University strives to issue the appeal officer鈥檚 written decision within (21) days of an appeal being filed.

XIX. ADVISOR OF CHOICE

From the point a Formal Complaint is made, and until an investigation, adjudication, and appeal are complete, the Complainant and Respondent will have the right to be accompanied by an advisor of their choice to all meetings, interviews, and hearings that are part of the investigation, adjudication, and appeal process. The advisor may be, but is not required to be, an attorney.

Except for the questioning of witnesses during the hearing specified in 鈥淗earing,鈥 the advisor will play a passive role and is not permitted to communicate on behalf of a party, insist that communication flow through the advisor, or communicate with the University about the matter without the party being included in the communication. In the event a party鈥檚 advisor of choice engages in material violation of the parameters specified in this Section and 鈥淗earing,鈥 the University may preclude the advisor from further participation, in which case the party may select a new advisor of their choice.

In the event a party is not able to secure an advisor to attend the hearing specified in 鈥淗earing,鈥 and requests the University to provide an advisor, the University will provide the party an advisor, without fee or charge, who will conduct questioning on behalf of the party at the hearing. The University will have sole discretion to select the advisor it provides. The advisor the University provides may be, but is not required to be, an attorney.

The University is not required to provide a party with an advisor in any circumstance except where the party does not have an advisor present at the hearing specified in 鈥淗earing,鈥 and requests that the University provide an advisor.

XX. TREATMENT RECORDS AND OTHER PRIVILEGED INFORMATION

During the investigation and adjudication processes, the investigator and adjudicator, as the case may be, are not permitted to access, consider, disclose, permit questioning concerning, or otherwise use:

  • A party鈥檚 records that are made or maintained by a physician, psychiatrist, psychologist, or other recognized professional or paraprofessional acting in the professional or paraprofessional鈥檚 capacity, or assisting in that capacity, and which are made and maintained in connection with the provision of treatment to the party; or
  • Information or records protected from disclosure by any other legally-recognized privilege, such as the attorney client privilege;
  • unless the University has obtained the party鈥檚 voluntary, written consent to do so for the purposes of the investigation and adjudication process.

Notwithstanding the foregoing, the investigator and/or adjudicator, as the case may be, may consider any such records or information otherwise covered by this Section if the party holding the privilege affirmatively discloses the records or information to support their allegation or defense, as the case may be.

XXI. SEXUAL HISTORY

During the investigation and adjudication processes, questioning regarding a Complainant鈥檚 sexual predisposition or prior sexual behavior are not relevant, unless such questions and evidence about the Complainant鈥檚 prior sexual behavior are offered to prove that someone other than the Respondent committed the conduct alleged, or if the questions and evidence concern specific incidents of the Complainant鈥檚 prior sexual behavior with respect to the Respondent and are offered to prove consent. Notwithstanding the foregoing, a Complainant who affirmatively uses information otherwise considered irrelevant by this Section for the purpose of supporting the Complainant鈥檚 allegations, may be deemed to have waived the protections of this Section.

XXII. INFORMAL RESOLUTION

At any time after the parties are provided written notice of the Formal Complaint as specified in 鈥淣otice of Formal Complaint,鈥 and before the completion of any appeal specified in 鈥淎ppeal,鈥 the parties may voluntarily consent, with the Title IX Correspondent鈥檚 approval, to engage in mediation, facilitated resolution, or other form of dispute resolution the goal of which is to enter into a final resolution resolving the allegations raised in the Formal Complaint by agreement of the parties. Administrative Adjudication as specified in 鈥淎dministrative Adjudication鈥 is a form of informal resolution.

The specific manner of any informal resolution process will be determined by the parties and the Title IX Correspondent, in consultation together. Prior to commencing the informal resolution process agreed upon, the Title IX Correspondent will transmit a written notice to the parties that:

  • Describes the parameters and requirements of the informal resolution process to be utilized;
  • Identifies the individual responsible for facilitating the informal resolution (who may be the Title IX Correspondent, another University official, or a suitable third-party);
  • Explains the effect of participating in informal resolution and/or reaching a final resolution will have on a party鈥檚 ability to resume the investigation and adjudication of the allegations at issue in the Formal Complaint; and
  • Explains any other consequence resulting from participation in the informal resolution process, including a description of records that will be generated, maintained, and/or shared.

After receiving the written notice specified in this paragraph, each party must voluntarily provide written consent to the Title IX Correspondent, before the informal resolution may commence.

During the pendency of the informal resolution process, the investigation and adjudication processes that would otherwise occur are stayed and all related deadlines are suspended.

If the parties reach a resolution through the informal resolution process, and the Title IX Correspondent agrees that the resolution is not clearly unreasonable, the Title IX Correspondent will reduce the terms of the agreed resolution to writing and present the resolution to the parties for their written signature. Once both parties and the Title IX Correspondent sign the resolution, the resolution is final, and the allegations addressed by the resolution are considered resolved and will not be subject to further investigation, adjudication, remediation, or discipline by the University, except as otherwise provided in the resolution itself, absent a showing that a party induced the resolution by fraud, misrepresentation, or other misconduct or where required to avoid a manifest injustice to either party or to the University. Notwithstanding the forgoing if the form of informal resolution is Administrative Adjudication as specified in 鈥滱dministrative Adjudication,鈥 there shall not be an agreed resolution requiring the parties鈥 signatures; instead, the determination issued by the administrative officer shall serve as the resolution and conclude the informal resolution process, subject only to any right of appeal. With the exception of a resolution resulting from the Administrative Adjudication process specified in 鈥淎dministrative Adjudication,鈥 all other forms of informal resolution pursuant to this Section are not subject to appeal.

A party may withdraw their consent to participate in informal resolution at any time before a resolution has been finalized.

Absent extension by the Title IX Correspondent, any informal resolution process must be completed within twenty-one (21) days. If an informal resolution process does not result in a resolution within twenty-one (21) days, and absent an extension, abeyance, or other contrary ruling by the Title IX Correspondent, the informal resolution process will be deemed terminated, and the Formal Complaint will be resolved pursuant to the investigation and adjudication procedures. The Title IX Correspondent may adjust any time periods or deadlines in the investigation and/or adjudication process that were suspended due to the informal resolution.

Other language in this Section notwithstanding, informal resolution will not be permitted if the Respondent is a non-student employee accused of committing Sexual Harassment against a student.

XXIII. PRESUMPTION OF NON-RESPONSIBILITY

From the time a report or Formal Complaint is made, a Respondent is presumed not responsible for the alleged misconduct until a determination regarding responsibility is made final.

XXIV. RESOURCES

Any individual affected by or accused of Sexual Harassment will have equal access to support and counseling services offered through the University. The University encourages any individual who has questions or concerns to seek support of University identified resources. The Title IX Correspondent is available to provide information about the University鈥檚 policy and procedure and to provide assistance. A list of University identified resources is located at the following: .

XXV. CONFLICTS OF INTEREST, BIAS, AND PROCEDURAL COMPLAINTS

The Title IX Correspondent, investigator, hearing officer, administrative officer, appeals officer, and informal resolution facilitator will be free of any material conflicts of interest or material bias. Any party who believes one or more of these University officials has a material conflict of interest or material bias must raise the concern promptly so that the University may evaluate the concern and find a substitute, if appropriate. The failure of a party to timely raise a concern of a conflict of interest or bias may result in a waiver of the issue for purposes of any appeal specified in 鈥淎ppeal,鈥 or otherwise.

XXVI. OBJECTIONS GENERALLY

Parties are expected to raise any objections, concerns, or complaints about the investigation, adjudication, and appeals process in a prompt and timely manner so that the University may evaluate the matter and address it, if appropriate.

XXVII. ACADEMIC FREEDOM

The University will construe and apply this policy consistent with the principles of academic freedom. In no case will a Respondent be found to have committed Sexual Harassment based on expressive conduct that is protected by the principles of academic freedom.

XXVIII. RELATIONSHIP WITH CRIMINAL PROCESS

This policy sets forth the University鈥檚 processes for responding to reports and Formal Complaints of Sexual Harassment. The University鈥檚 processes are separate, distinct, and independent of any criminal processes. While the University may temporarily delay its processes under this policy to avoid interfering with law enforcement efforts if requested by law enforcement, the University will otherwise apply this policy and its processes without regard to the status or outcome of any criminal process.

XXIX. RECORDINGS

Wherever this policy specifies that an audio or video recording will be made, the recording will be made only by the University and is considered property of the University, subject to any right of access that a party may have under this policy, FERPA, and other applicable federal, state, or local laws. Only the University is permitted to make audio or video recordings under this policy. The surreptitious recording of any meeting, interview, hearing, or other interaction contemplated under this policy is strictly prohibited. Any party who wishes to transcribe a hearing by use of a transcriptionist must seek pre-approval from the hearing officer.

XXX. VENDORS, CONTRACTORS AND THIRD PARTIES

The University does business with various vendors, contractors, and other third-parties who are not students or employees of the University. Notwithstanding any rights that a given vendor, contractor, or third-party Respondent may have under this policy, the University retains its right to limit any vendor, contractor, or third-party鈥檚 access to campus for any reason. And the University retains all rights it enjoys by contract or law to terminate its relationship with any vendor, contractor, or third-party irrespective of any process or outcome under this policy.

XXXI. BAD FAITH COMPLAINTS AND FALSE INFORMATION

It is a violation of this policy for any person to submit a report or Formal Complaint that the person knows, at the time the report or Formal Complaint is submitted, to be false or frivolous. It is also a violation of this policy for any person to knowingly make a materially false statement during the course of an investigation, adjudication, or appeal under this policy. Violations of this Section are not subject to the investigation and adjudication processes in this policy; instead, they will be addressed under the Student Handbook in the case of students and other University policies and standards, as applicable, for other persons.

XXXII. RETALIATION

It is a violation of this policy to engage in Retaliation. Reports and Formal Complaints of retaliation may be made in the manner specified in 鈥淩eporting Sexual Harassment,鈥 and 鈥淔ormal Complaint.鈥 Any report or Formal Complaint of Retaliation will be processed under this policy in the same manner as a report or Formal Complaint of Sexual Harassment, as the case may be. The University retains discretion to consolidate a Formal Complaint of Retaliation with a Formal Complaint of Sexual Harassment for investigation and/or adjudication purposes if the two Formal Complaints share a common nexus.

XXXIII. CONFIDENTIALITY

The University will keep confidential the identity of any individual who has made a report or Formal Complaint of Sexual Harassment or Retaliation including any Complainant, the identity of any individual who has been reported to be a perpetrator of Sexual Harassment or Retaliation including any Respondent, and the identity of any witness. The University will also maintain the confidentiality of its various records generated in response to reports and Formal Complaints, including, but not limited to, information concerning Supportive Measures, notices, investigation materials, adjudication records, and appeal records. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the University may reveal the identity of any person or the contents of any record if permitted by FERPA, if necessary to carry out the University鈥檚 obligations under Title IX and its implementing regulations including the conduct of any investigation, adjudication, or appeal under this policy or any subsequent judicial proceeding, or as otherwise required by law. Further, notwithstanding the University鈥檚 general obligation to maintain confidentiality as specified herein, the parties to a report or Formal Complaint will be given access to investigation and adjudication materials in the circumstances specified in this policy.

While the University will maintain confidentiality specified in this Section, the University will not limit the ability of the parties to discuss the allegations at issue in a particular case. Parties are advised, however, that the manner in which they communicate about, or discuss a particular case, may constitute Sexual Harassment or Retaliation in certain circumstances and be subject to discipline pursuant to the processes specified in this policy.

Note that certain types of Sexual Harassment are considered crimes for which the University must disclose crime statistics in its Annual Security Report that is provided to the campus community and available to the public. These disclosures will be made without including personally identifying information.

XXXIV. OTHER VIOLATIONS OF THIS POLICY

Alleged violations of this policy, other than violations of the prohibitions on Sexual Harassment and Retaliation, will be subject to review under the Student Handbook for students or other University policies and standards for employees.

XXXV. SIGNATURES AND FORM OF CONSENT

For purposes of this policy, either a physical signature or digital signature will be sufficient to satisfy any obligation that a document be signed. Where this policy provides that written consent must be provided, consent in either physical or electronic form, containing a physical or digital signature, as the case may be, will suffice.

XXXVI. DEADLINES, TIME, NOTICES, AND METHOD OF TRANSMITTAL

Where this policy specifies a period of days by which some act must be performed, the following method of calculation applies:

  • Exclude the day of the event that triggers the period;
  • Count every day, including intermediate Saturdays, Sundays, and legal holidays recognized by the federal government;
  • Include the last day of the period until 5:00 p.m. central time, but if the last day is a Saturday, Sunday, or legal holiday recognized by the federal government, the period continues to run until 5:00 p.m. central time on the next day that is not a Saturday, Sunday, or legal holiday recognized by the federal government.

All deadlines and other time periods specified in this policy are subject to modification by the University where, in the University鈥檚 sole discretion, good cause exists. Good cause may include, but is not limited to, the unavailability of parties or witnesses; the complexities of a given case; extended holidays or closures; sickness of the investigator, adjudicator, or the parties; the need to consult with the University鈥檚 legal counsel; unforeseen weather events; and the like.

Any party who wishes to seek an extension of any deadline or other time period may do so by filing a request with the investigator, hearing officer, administrative officer, appeal officer, or Title IX Correspondent, as the case may be, depending on the phase of the process. Such request must state the extension sought and explain what good cause exists for the requested extension. The University officer resolving the request for extension may, but is not required to, give the other party an opportunity to object.

Whether to grant such a requested extension will be in the sole discretion of the University.

The parties will be provided written notice of the modification of any deadline or time period specified in this policy, along with the reasons for the modification.

Where this policy refers to notice being given to parties 鈥渟imultaneously,鈥 notice will be deemed simultaneous if it is provided in relative proximity on the same day. It is not necessary that notice be provided at exactly the same hour and minute.

Unless otherwise specified in this policy, the default method of transmission for all notices, reports, responses, and other forms of communication specified in this policy will be email using University email addresses.

A party is deemed to have received notice upon transmittal of an email to their University email address. In the event notice is provided by mail, a party will be deemed to have received notice three (3) days after the notice in question is postmarked.

Any notice inviting or requiring a party or witness to attend a meeting, interview, or hearing will be provided with sufficient time for the party to prepare for the meeting, interview, or hearing as the case may be, and will include relevant details such as the date, time, location, purpose, and participants. Unless a specific number of days is specified elsewhere in this policy, the sufficient time to be provided will be determined in the sole discretion of the University, considering all the facts and circumstances, including, but not limited to, the nature of the meeting, interview, or hearing; the nature and complexity of the allegations at issue; the schedules of relevant University officials; approaching holidays or closures; and the number and length of extensions already granted.

XXXVII. OTHER FORMS OF DISCRIMINATION

This policy applies only to Sexual Harassment. Complaints of other forms of sex discrimination are governed by the Non-Discrimination, Non-Harassment and Non-Retaliation 鈥 Student Policy.

XXXVIII. EDUCATION

The University offers education programs promoting the prevention of Sexual Harassment, Sexual Assault, Domestic Violence, Dating Violence, and Stalking including an online primary awareness program for incoming students and new employees, as well as bystander intervention training(s) to promote ongoing awareness for current students and employees. Current students and employees who started work before the online module was available may participate in it by contacting the Title IX Correspondent.

XXXIX. OUTSIDE APPOINTMENTS, DUAL APPOINTMENTS, AND DELEGATIONS

The University retains discretion to retain and appoint suitably qualified persons who are not University employees to fulfill any function of the University under this policy, including, but not limited to, the investigator, hearing officer, administrative officer, informal resolution officer, and/or appeals officer.

The University also retains discretion to appoint two or more persons to jointly fulfill the role of investigator, hearing officer, administrative officer, informal resolution officer, and/or appeals officer.

The functions assigned to a given University official under this policy, including but not limited to the functions assigned to the Title IX Correspondent, investigator, hearing officer, administrative officer, informal resolution officer, and appeals officer, may, in the University鈥檚 discretion, be delegated by such University official to any suitably qualified individual and such delegation may be recalled by the University at any time.

XL. TRAINING

The University will ensure that University officials acting under this policy, including but not limited to the Title IX Correspondent, investigators, hearing officers, administrative officers, informal resolution facilitators, University provided advisors, and appeals officers receive training in compliance with 34 C.F.R. 搂 106.45(b)(1)(iii) and any other applicable federal or state law.

XLI. RECORDKEEPING

The University will retain those records specified in 34 C.F.R. 搂 106.45(b)(10) for a period of seven years after which point in time they may be destroyed, or continue to be retained, in the University鈥檚 sole discretion. The records specified in 34 C.F.R. 搂 106.45(b)(10) will be made available for inspection, and/or published, to the extent required by 34 C.F.R. 搂 106.45(b)(10) and consistent with any other applicable federal or state law, including FERPA.

XLII. DEFINITIONS HEREIN

Words used in this policy will have those meanings defined herein and if not defined herein will be construed according to their plain and ordinary meaning.

XLIII. DISCRETION IN APPLICATION

The University retains discretion to interpret and apply this policy in a manner that is not clearly unreasonable, even if the University鈥檚 interpretation or application differs from the interpretation of the parties.

Despite the University鈥檚 reasonable efforts to anticipate all eventualities in drafting this policy, it is possible unanticipated or extraordinary circumstances may not be specifically or reasonably addressed by the express policy language, in which case the University retains discretion to respond to the unanticipated or extraordinary circumstance in a way that is not clearly unreasonable.

The provisions of this policy and the Hearing Procedures referenced in 鈥淗earing 鈥 are not contractual in nature, whether in their own right, or as part of any other express or implied contract. Accordingly, the University retains discretion to revise this policy and the Hearing Procedures at any time, and for any reason. The University may apply policy revisions to an active case provided that doing so is not clearly unreasonable.

Religious Liberty

The University qualifies as an educational institution controlled by a religious organization as specified in 34 C.F.R. 搂 106.12. No provision of this policy, or of Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972 or its implementing regulations, shall be applied in such a way as to conflict with the University鈥檚 Christian beliefs.

I. Purpose and Nature of These Procedures

These procedures supplement the University鈥檚 Sexual Harassment Policy and specify how the University will conduct hearings regarding Formal Complaints of Sexual Harassment. To the extent there is a conflict between these procedures and the University鈥檚 Sexual Harassment Policy, the Sexual Harassment Policy shall control.

II. The Hearing Officer

The hearing officer oversees the hearing process, rules on questions of relevance and admissibility, resolves all procedural disputes, and renders a determination of responsibility for the allegations in the Formal Complaint at the conclusion of the hearing process and in the manner specified in the policy. The hearing officer has discretion to interpret, apply, and modify these procedures in any manner that is not clearly unreasonable and is consistent with the policy.

III. Pre-Hearing Review of Investigation Report and Evidence

Prior to commencement of the hearing, the hearing officer will review the investigation report and a copy of all evidence transmitted to the parties by the investigator as specified in the policy. This review of materials is provisional and intended to provide background and orientation to the hearing officer in planning and conducting the hearing. The hearing officer must exclude from consideration in deliberation any evidence developed during the investigation that is deemed inadmissible at the hearing, including specifically, but not limited to, the statements of any party or witness who refuses to submit to questioning by a party advisor as specified in the policy.

IV. Convening the Hearing

Immediately prior to convening the hearing, the hearing officer will ensure that a recording or transcription of the hearing is being made by the University and that the hearing room is cleared of all individuals who are not permitted to be present during the hearing as specified in the policy. The hearing officer will then convene the hearing and clearly state for the record the date, time, and location of the hearing; the names of the Complainant and Respondent; the parties present at the hearing; any accommodations that have been provided at the request of a party or in the University鈥檚 discretion; whether all or a portion of the hearing is being conducted virtually as specified in the policy; and any other introductory matters that the hearing officer deems appropriate.

V. Statement of the Investigator

After convening the hearing, the hearing officer will call the investigator to give an overview of the investigation process. Thereafter, the investigator will be subject to questioning by the hearing officer, followed by questioning from each party鈥檚 advisor commencing first with questioning from the advisor for the Complainant followed by questioning from the advisor for the Respondent.

VI. Statements of the Parties

After questioning of the investigator is complete, the hearing officer will invite the Complainant to provide a statement to the hearing officer regarding the events in question and identify and comment on any non-testimonial evidence the Complainant believes is relevant. After the Complainant has made a statement, or waived the right to make a statement, the Complainant will be subject to questioning by the hearing officer, followed by questioning from the advisor for the Respondent.

After questioning of the Complainant is complete, the hearing officer will invite the Respondent to provide a statement to the hearing officer regarding the events in question and to identify and comment on any non-testimonial evidence the Complainant believes is relevant. After the Respondent has made a statement, or waived the right to make a statement, the Respondent will be subject to questioning by the hearing officer, followed by questioning from the advisor for the Complainant.

VII. Testimony of Witnesses

After questioning of the parties is complete, witnesses will be called to testify in the order determined by the hearing officer. Unlike the parties, witnesses will not be invited to make a statement but, instead, will be subject to questioning from the hearing officer followed by questioning from each party鈥檚 advisor commencing first with questioning from the advisor for the Complainant followed by questioning from the advisor for the Respondent.

VIII. Investigation Materials

After the questioning of witnesses is complete, the hearing officer will identify any portion of the evidence developed during the investigation that the hearing officer has determined should be excluded from the hearing record based on rulings made at the pre-hearing conference, during the hearing itself, due to the refusal of a party or witness to submit to questioning by a party advisor, or for any other reason. The hearing officer will then provide the parties a final opportunity to raise any additional objections to inclusion of any other portions of the investigation record into evidence and resolve any such objections. All evidence from the investigation and hearing not specifically excluded by the hearing officer shall be deemed admitted into the hearing record and may be considered by the hearing officer as part of the deliberation.

IX. Closing Argument

After the questioning of the witnesses is complete, the hearing officer will invite the Complainant to make a closing argument. After the Complainant has made a closing argument, or waived the right to make a closing argument, the hearing officer will invite the Respondent to make a closing argument.

X. Deliberation

After closing arguments are complete, the hearing officer will conclude the hearing and deliberate and render a determination as specified in the policy.

XI. Access to and Use of Investigation Evidence

During the hearing, the parties and their advisors shall have access to the investigation report and a copy of all evidence transmitted to the parties by the investigator as specified in the policy. Such evidence may be utilized in the questioning of witnesses where relevant. Non-testimonial evidence utilized during the hearing shall be marked and referred to in such a manner as to make it clearly identifiable by audio (i.e., such as sequential marking of 鈥渆xhibits鈥).

XII. Rulings on Evidence

Throughout the hearing, the hearing officer will independently and contemporaneously screen all questions for relevance and resolve any contemporaneous evidentiary objections raised by the parties. If the hearing officer does not exclude a question, it is presumed the hearing officer has deemed the question relevant and admissible. Although formal rules of evidence do not apply, the hearing officer may, in the hearing officer鈥檚 discretion, utilize evidentiary principles similar to those specified in the Federal Rules of Evidence to the extent such evidentiary principles are not contrary to the policy.

XIII. Timing and Continuances

The hearing officer will have discretion to set the overall length of the hearing and may set time limits for statements of the parties, questioning of parties and witnesses, and closing arguments. A hearing will not exceed seven (7) hours in length absent extraordinary circumstances. Once a hearing is commenced, it will be continued only for good cause as determined by the hearing officer.

XIV. Role of Advisors

As specified in the policy, advisors to the parties must play a passive role in the hearing with the sole exception that advisors are permitted to question parties and witnesses as specified the policy. Advisors are not permitted to speak for their advisee, make objections, present arguments, or engage in any other active role.

XV. Disruptions

All parties, advisors, and other persons present at a hearing are required to act professionally, maintain decorum, and abide by the policy, these procedures, and any other rules specified by the hearing officer. Any party, advisor, or other person who materially disrupts the proceeding or violates applicable policies, procedures, and rules, may be barred from further participation and/or have their participation limited, as the case may be, by the hearing officer.

XVI. Questioning

Wherever these procedures contemplate questioning of a party or witnesses, the hearing officer has discretion to permit more than one round of questioning. In addition to ruling on questions of relevance, the hearing officer may limit cumulative and redundant questioning.

XVII. Discretion in Application

The University retains discretion to interpret and apply these procedures in a manner that is not clearly unreasonable, even if the University鈥檚 interpretation or application differs from the interpretation of the parties.

Despite the University鈥檚 reasonable efforts to anticipate all eventualities in these procedures, it is possible unanticipated or extraordinary circumstances may not be specifically or reasonably addressed by the express language of these procedures, in which case the University retains discretion to respond to the unanticipated or extraordinary circumstance in a way that is not clearly unreasonable.

 

Have Questions? Contact Us.

花椒直播
admiss@stmary.edu
913-682-5151

See the staff/faculty directory